Frêsh Fish |
Archive Mea Culpa. The above Archive Link & the Search This Blog Link do not work. This happened after Google, the king of search, bought Blogger?
Frêsh Fish - Much magic for a little fish.
Frêsh Fish is a combination of new and spirited with the added bonus being that everyone knows that fish is best fresh. The icing on the cake was that my mother’s mother, Lena, always told her and she me, that fish was brain food. So with Frêsh Fish we have spirited and new food for thought, ideas, that ain’t got no stink. I was suppose to eat fish today and did not. I hope I can be forgiven.
|
Sunday, March 16, 2014
The term "genetic variability" is not well defined in discussions of the difference between genetic variability of human beings relative to other life forms. It is unclear if the difference between individuals in the various groups being compared is in the composition of their genes - protein coding regions - or in their Junk DNA. A question I am now considering is how sensitive is a protein to its amino acid representation? Can extra amino acids be included within the linear nucleotide sequence without influencing the production of a protein - perhaps just skipped over the unneeded nucleotides? Another way of stating this is, is there Junk DNA within the protein coding sequence? "Humans generally are highly inbred - I remember reading somewhere that two chimpanzees from the same forest may differ more from each other than the furthest removed human populations. There is also a lot of variation between various human groups - Africans are generally the most diverse and East Asians the least. Ashkenazi Jews are so inbred that they are basically all related to each other as fourth or fifth degree cousins. Cheetahs are so inbred that skin can be transplanted between individuals with no chances of rejection. This of course has drawbacks in form of poor adaptability, very low survival rates for kittens and being more prone to diseases." http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/81795-genetic-variability/ http://genetics.thetech.org/node/731 When comparing the DNA of humans and chimps there are 2 conflicting statements. One strain of thought emphasizes how different the genetic makeup is of humans and chimps. Stating that humans have a lot less genetic variability than chimpanzees. The other statement focuses on how similar the DNA of humans and chimps are. Here is a very informative letter published in Nature magazine - Unexpectedly Large Difference in Y Chromosome of Human in Comparison to Chimpanzee This large difference in the Y Chromosome of Human in Comparison to Chimpanzee is supported by the diagram above that compares the chromosomes of Humans and Chipanzees. The Y chromosome is the last chromosome in the series. In each set the human chromosome is on the left and the chimpanzee is on the right. In the diagram the human Y chromosome is much larger than the chimpanzee. Cell - Nucleus - DNA - Nucleotides - C,A,T,G - code for amino acids and random (Junk DNA) - amino acids code for proteins. Genes are sequences on the chromosome that code for proteins. DNA = genes + Junk. The term genome refers to all nucleotides - protein coding and Junk. 98.5% of the human genome codes for junk. Only 1.5% of the information contained in the human genome codes for proteins = genes. In the article Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome Nature 1/9/2001 I found this statement very interesting - "The mutation rate is about twice as high in male as in female meiosis, showing that most mutation occurs in males." I am actually surprised that male mutation rate is not much higher. © 2014 big box industries
|